Difference between revisions of "FinancialCentreFutures:San Francisco"
From ZYen
Marc morris (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "=San Francisco - Quick Summary= <center>400px</center> <div class="center" style="...") |
Marc morris (Talk | contribs) (→San Francisco - Quick Summary) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;"> <small> San Francisco (Blue), [[FinancialCentreFutures:New York|New York]] (Navy), [[FinancialCentreFutures:Geneva|Geneva]] (Green) & [[FinancialCentreFutures:Shanghai|Shanghai]] (Torquoise)</small> </div> | <div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;"> <small> San Francisco (Blue), [[FinancialCentreFutures:New York|New York]] (Navy), [[FinancialCentreFutures:Geneva|Geneva]] (Green) & [[FinancialCentreFutures:Shanghai|Shanghai]] (Torquoise)</small> </div> | ||
| − | [[FinancialCentreFutures:Global Financial Centres Index|GFCI]]11 describes San Francisco as an Established Player, which is locally both broad and deep. It has a particular strength in the Asset Management sub-indices, as well as being Top 10 in Professional Services. Between GFCI1 and GFCI11 San Francisco has closed the gap to leaders [[FinancialCentreFutures:London|London]] and [[FinancialCentreFutures:New York|New York]], but has not shown the same level of improvement as some Asian centres (such as [[FinancialCentreFutures:Shanghai|Shanghai]]), although it's ratings have been more consistent. Despite this, San Francisco has performed better than European Centres and has now achieved a similar rating to [[FinancialCentreFutures:Geneva|Geneva]]. San | + | [[FinancialCentreFutures:Global Financial Centres Index|GFCI]]11 describes San Francisco as an Established Player, which is locally both broad and deep. It has a particular strength in the Asset Management sub-indices, as well as being Top 10 in Professional Services. Between GFCI1 and GFCI11 San Francisco has closed the gap to leaders [[FinancialCentreFutures:London|London]] and [[FinancialCentreFutures:New York|New York]], but has not shown the same level of improvement as some Asian centres (such as [[FinancialCentreFutures:Shanghai|Shanghai]]), although it's ratings have been more consistent. Despite this, San Francisco has performed better than European Centres and has now achieved a similar rating to [[FinancialCentreFutures:Geneva|Geneva]]. San Francisco is a Top 5 centre in North America. |
Latest revision as of 15:21, 17 July 2012
[edit] San Francisco - Quick Summary
_-_(New_York_(Navy),_Geneva_(Green)_%26_Shanghai_(Torquoise)).jpg)
GFCI11 describes San Francisco as an Established Player, which is locally both broad and deep. It has a particular strength in the Asset Management sub-indices, as well as being Top 10 in Professional Services. Between GFCI1 and GFCI11 San Francisco has closed the gap to leaders London and New York, but has not shown the same level of improvement as some Asian centres (such as Shanghai), although it's ratings have been more consistent. Despite this, San Francisco has performed better than European Centres and has now achieved a similar rating to Geneva. San Francisco is a Top 5 centre in North America.
