Overview
Meta-Commerce is an intellectual and collaborative attempt to chart the path to the future of finance. It aims to set the critical questions finance is facing. A contemporary version of David Hilbert's 23 questions for mathematics, Meta-Commerce looks to engage thought leaders and shape the research agenda on financial practices and systems in the long term.
These 78 questions, encompassing economics, finance and society, are a first attempt to map the road to Long Finance and contribute to its overarching goals - to expand frontiers, change systems, deliver services and build communities. These questions should be seen as a starter set which should be expanded, trimmed, combined and reworked.
The Questions
Long-Term vs. Short-Term
1)
|
Is there long term asset alignment, e.g. pensions and mortgages, or divergence?
|
2)
|
The benefits of diversification – how rapidly do these benefits decay with time?
|
3)
|
With household savings rates below 2.5% in the USA and below 3% in the UK, large numbers of people seem to have realised that saving is a bad deal in the long-term - the reward for financial prudence is to get shafted by the majority who don’t save - so why save when you just pay more tax and lose utility?
|
4)
|
What are the implications of long-term asset valuation e.g. can one be made? Is there an interaction between valuation periods and volatility?
|
5)
|
When should you be short-term?
|
6)
|
Life expectancy and its implications on financial decisions?
|
7)
|
Creating demand for the long-term
|
8)
|
Extending the Economist’s Felicity Foresight idea from 1999 to Debbie’s Diversification over 100 years – the time traveller investor
|
9)
|
How would anyone know you’d mis-sold a 100 year project?
|
10)
|
Is commerce truly not a zero-sum game?
|
11)
|
What are secrets of success among the finances of the Vatican?
|
12)
|
Family businesses that last - http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_PQJDGRQ
|
13)
|
Anything on the Social Discount rate
|
Fiscal vs. Monetary
14)
|
How might we price counter-cyclicality?
|
15)
|
What is the discount rate of a politician?
|
16)
|
Can/should an economy be made to deliver stable (unspectacular) growth, or should economies be constantly on steroids?
|
17)
|
Which is best, multiple currencies, single currencies, other currencies, SDRs, etc?
|
18)
|
How does fiscal policy affect liquidity?
|
19)
|
What is the difference between consumption and investment? Can we tell them apart? Can the utility of investment approach the utility of consumption?
|
20)
|
How do we identify bubbles? Are bubbles formed when returns are delayed?
|
21)
|
How do ‘new’ risks, e.g. climate change, asteroids, start to enter the fiscal calculus
|
22)
|
How much does Keynesianism depend on Keynesian conditions (e.g. low government expenditure as % of GDP)?
|
Free vs. Regulated
23)
|
Can we treat trade as an intelligent life-form?
|
24)
|
Should regulation involve indemnity?
|
25)
|
When should things be “bailed out”?
|
26)
|
Do the dangers of ‘best practice’ reduce diversity?
|
27)
|
What is the value of high velocity trading?
|
28)
|
Privatising risk, nationalising reward?
|
Selfish vs. Selfless (Agents vs. Owners)
29)
|
Turnover of investment managers portfolios, i.e. long-term = lower volatility and selling mandate measures that recognise the long-term is inversely correlated to share turnover/investment turnover
|
30)
|
Volatility of funds, i.e. long-term = lower volatility;
|
31)
|
What does ‘absolute returns’ mean?
|
32)
|
Moving from “institutional agents” voting (rather than “institutional investors”) to beneficial shareholders voting;
|
33)
|
Does altruistic self-interest exist – can people willfully NOT follow self-interest decisions?
|
34)
|
Mutual destruction – let’s go bust together
|
35)
|
Does professionalism matter? Or personal ethics?
|
36)
|
What are the pluses and minuses of positional goods?
|
37)
|
Can you do much more than one thing, e.g. deliver profit
|
38)
|
How do ideas propagate through finance?
|
39)
|
Is social cohesion strained by inequality?
|
40)
|
Does progress require a society where the few are disproportionately rewarded versus the many?
|
41)
|
How do we value human networks?
|
42)
|
What are the rules of true trust?
|
43)
|
What does long term brokerage mean?
|
Mutual vs. Public Sector vs. Private-Sector
44)
|
Are keiretsu good things, conglomerates, private equity?
|
45)
|
How do we price trust?
|
46)
|
The equitisation of debt, i.e. the replacement of debt instruments with shared equity ownership, resulting in innovative risk/reward sharing arrangements [Lars Wulf]
|
47)
|
What can we learn from the oldest organisations – churches, universities, schools guilds, families (pick up from existing research)?
|
48)
|
Are the oldest organisations similar, do they encourage diversity or restrict it? What metrics should be used to evaluate them?
|
49)
|
Do successful organisations just have a system that promotes a successful decision-maker for the time?
|
50)
|
Do successful organizations promote trust and thus lower transactions costs?
|
51)
|
Building the insurer that could never go bust
|
52)
|
Building the ultimate mutual
|
53)
|
[from Mick James] “One more long-finance anecdote, possibly apocryphal: in land-owning British families it was traditional, when a daughter was born, to plant a grove of willow trees. By the daughter came of marriageable age, the willows were mature enough to be cut down and sold to the makers of cricket bats: the proceeds paid for the wedding.”
|
54)
|
Can we create an out-of-the-box mutual investment vehicle that needs no maintenance – automated fund management for the masses? [Frank Dunn]
|
55)
|
Regulation, monitoring, supervision, competition;
|
56)
|
How do we prevent the moral hazard of governments promising what they need for votes, tyranny of the silent majority?
|
57)
|
Are NGOs a sign of failure or a new life form?
|
58)
|
What is the effect of taxation on the value of money?
|
59)
|
Can we build retirement cohorts?
|
Rational vs. Behavioural
60)
|
Is ‘nudging’ethical
|
61)
|
Should we ‘read’ people’s brains?
|
62)
|
Is trust an emergent property of large networks?
|
63)
|
What can we learn from harsh climates - the finances of the Inuit or Bushmen?
|
64)
|
What can we learn from conditions of over-abundance, e.g. economic booms and busts of the potlatch system among the Northwest coast Indians (Tlingit and such)? [John Abbink]
|
65)
|
Why does augury sell?
|
66)
|
How might money affect our evolution as primates?
|
Sustainability vs. Robustness vs. Resilience
67)
|
Sustainable supply chains – not transaction by transaction, more trust
|
68)
|
Assume a 1% improvement in productivity each year – so a genuine increase of 1% per annum in wealth per capita – you then need about 70 years to double your money in real terms. Therefore today’s 20 year old can expect to have doubled his/her savings contribution by the age of 90. Higher returns are the result of inter-generational transfers of wealth, or the growth in population. Population needs to peak during the lifetime of todays 20 year old, or the planet goes to hell. Inter-generational wealth transfers won’t work without population increases as eventually the paying generation revolts. So back to productivity increases as the only real source of wealth increase. Question: Is there another sustainable source of wealth generation? If not, how do we improve the rate of productivity increases in order to create a robust long finance framework?
|
69)
|
How can we introduce and measure ‘simplicity’?
|
70)
|
How do we internalise externalities?
|
71)
|
How do we prevent internalities becoming externalities?
|
72)
|
Is there a way to value abundance rather than scarcity? [Tantram]
|
Theory vs. Practice
73)
|
What radical new theories are (a) elegant, (b) coherent, (c) profound?
|
74)
|
Valuing the hard to value – what is mark-to-market, do third parties know what they’re doing?
|
75)
|
Is finance a good in its own right, a source of information, a self preserving feedback loop, or a parasite?
|
76)
|
Rejecta Economica (like Rejecta Mathematica – Economist, 1 August 02009) – what might be learned from discarded economics?
|
77)
|
Finance as fashion – X Factor, Strictly Come Dancing
|
78)
|
What if one person had all the money?
|